Skip to main content

Table 1 Diagnostic yield of combined CNB and FNAB versus FNAB or CNB in the studied patients (n = 30)

From: Diagnostic yield of combined ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and core needle biopsy versus either technique alone in peripheral lung and pleural lesions

 

Final diagnosis

Diagnostic yield of combined FNAB and CNB

FNAB

CNB

c2(FEp)

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

All

30

100.0

30

100.0

30

100.0

30

100.0

–

 Malignant lesions

23

76.7

22

73.3

18

60.0

22

73.3

3.067 (0.187)

  Lung carcinoma

   Small cell carcinoma

1

3.3

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

–

   Adenocarcinoma

10

33.3

10

33.3

9

30.0

10

33.3

0.077 (0.781)

   Squamous cell carcinoma

5

16.7

5

16.7

4

13.3

5

16.7

0.131 (1.000)

   Undifferentiated carcinoma

4

13.3

4

13.3

2

6.7

4

13.3

0.741 (0.671)

  Mesothelioma

1

3.3

1

3.3

0

0.0

1

3.3

2.0 (1.000)

  Others

         

  Metastatic adenocarcinoma (colon)

1

3.3

1

3.3

1

3.3

1

3.3

0.0 (1.000)

  Metastatic adenocarcinoma (unknown primary)

1

3.3

1

3.3

1

3.3

1

3.3

0.0 (1.000)

 Benign lesions

7

23.3

7

23.3

1

3.3

7

23.3

10.50*(0.005*)

  Dense fibrous tissue

3

10.0

3

10.0

0

0.0

3

10.0

6.0 (0.100)

  Necrotizing granuloma

3

10.0

3

10.0

0

0.0

3

10.0

6.0 (0.100)

  Lipoid pneumonia

1

3.3

1

3.3

1

3.3

1

3.3

–

 Undiagnosed

0

0.0

1

3.3

11

36.7

1

3.3

 

  Undiagnosed

0

0.0

1

3.3

11

36.7

1

3.3

10.417*(0.001*)

  1. χ2 Chi square test, FE Fisher exact, p P value for comparing between FNAB and CNB
  2. *Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05