Skip to main content
The Egyptian Journal of Bronchology
Download PDF
  • Interventional Bronchology and pulmonology
  • Open access
  • Published:

The diagnostic value of ultrasound-guided percutaneous transthoracic core-needle biopsy versus computed tomography-guided biopsy in peripheral intrathoracic lesions

Egyptian Journal of Bronchology volume 10, pages 12–19 (2016)Cite this article

Abstract

Introduction

Transthoracic ultrasound has become an important diagnostic tool in peripheral intrathoracic lesions. Transthoracic needle biopsy is a relatively safe and easy procedure under real-time ultrasound (US) guidance, and may provide adequate tissue sampling of lesions for cytological, histological, or microbiological analysis.

Objectives

The aim of the present study was to compare the diagnostic yield, accuracy, and complications of thoracic US-guided core-needle biopsy versus computed tomography (CT)-guided biopsy in peripheral intrathoracic lesions, including pleural, peripheral pulmonary, and mediastinal lesions.

Patients and methods

US-guided biopsy and CT-guided biopsy were performed in Chest and Radiology Departments during the period from February 2011 to June 2014 on 100 patients (50 patients for each group) using core-biopsy needle, with needle size (16–18–20 G), needle length (20 cm), and core length (1–1.5–2 cm) according to the size and type of lesion. The histopathological examination and complications were reported.

Results

The diagnostic value of chest US was compared with CT; chest US had sensitivity 91.7%, specificity 89.4%, positive predictive value 73.3%, negative predictive value 97.1%, and accuracy 90% in detecting pleural lesions; 90.7, 91.4, 95.1, 84.2, and 91%, respectively, in detecting pulmonary lesions; and 72.7, 88.7, 44.4, 96.3, and 87%, respectively, in detecting mediastinal lesions compared with chest CT. After taking transthoracic biopsy, chest US-guided biopsy revealed four benign (8%), 30 malignant (60%), 10 inflammatory(20%), and six undiagnosed (12%) cases, whereas CT group revealed two (4%), 33 (66%), 10 (20%), and five (10%) cases, respectively, with a complication rate [pneumothorax: two (4%) cases for US group and three (6%) cases for CT group and pulmonary hemorrhage: two (4%) cases and three (6%) cases respectively].

Conclusion

Chest US-guided biopsy is safe, reliable, and a fast procedure with lower cost and fewer complications than is CT-guided biopsy, provided that the lesions have favorable acoustic window and abut the visceral pleura.

References

  1. Gleeson FV. Imaging in chest diseases. Medicine (Baltimore) 2008; 36:132–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shah A, Desai SR. Imaging in chest diseases. Medicine (Baltimore) 2012; 40:177–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Liao WCh, Tu Ch-Y, Shih Ch-M, Chen Ch-H, Chen H-J, Wu-Huel H. Ultrasound diagnosis of chest diseases. Intech 2013; 3:84–95.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hew M, Heinze S. Chest ultrasound in practice: a review of utility in the clinical setting. Intern Med J 2012; 42:856–865.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Manhire A, Charig M, Clelland C, Gleeson F, Miller R, Moss H, et al. Guidelines for radiologically guided lung biopsy. Thorax 2003; 58: 920–936.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Morvay Z, Szabó E, Tiszlavicz L, Furák J, Troján I, Palkó A. Thoracic core needle biopsy using ultrasound guidance. Ultrasound Q 2001; 17: 113–121.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Khankana AA, Al-Muaikeelb M. Image-guided percutaneous transthoracic biopsy in lung cancer – emphasis on CT-guided technique. J Infect Public Health 2012; 5:S22–S30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu CC, Maher MM, Shepard JA. CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy of the chest: preprocedural evaluation and technique. Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196:W511–W514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Feuerbach S, Schreyer A, Schlottmann K. Standards in radiographically guided biopsies – indications, techniques and complications. Radiologie Up2date 2003; 3:207–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lourenço R, Camacho R, Barata MJ, Canário D, Gaspar A, Cyrne C. CT-guided percutaneous transthoracic biopsy in the evaluation of undetermined pulmonary lesions. Rev Port Pneumol 2006; 12:503–524.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Patz EF Jr. Imaging bronchogenic carcinoma. Chest 2000; 117(Suppl 1): 90S–95S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sartori S, Tombesi P. Emerging roles for transthoracic ultrasonography in pulmonary diseases. World J Radiol 2010; 2:203–214.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Sheth S, Hamper UM, Stanley DB, Wheeler JH, Smith PA. US guidance for thoracic biopsy: a valuable alternative to CT. Radiology 1999; 210: 721–726.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chira R, Chira A, Mircea PA. Intrathoracic tumors in contact with the chest wall – ultrasonographic and computed tomography comparative evaluation. Med Ultrason 2012; 14:115–119.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lichtenstein D, Goldstein I, Mourgeon E, Cluzel P, Grenier P, Rouby JJ. Comparative diagnostic performances of auscultation, chest radiography, and lung ultrasonography in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Anesthesiology 2004; 100:9–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yu CJ, Yang PC, Wu HD, Chang DB, Kuo SH, Luh KT. Ultrasound study in unilateral hemithorax opacification. Image comparison with computed tomography. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993; 147:430–434.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Evans AL, Gleeson FV. Radiology in pleural disease: state of the art. Respirology 2004; 9:300–312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lichtenstein DA, Lascols N, Mezière G, Gepner A. Ultrasound diagnosis of alveolar consolidation in the critically ill. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30:276–281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Koh DM, Burke S, Davies N, Padley SP. Transthoracic US of the chest: clinical uses and applications. Radiographics 2002; 22:e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wernecke K, Vassallo P, Pötter R, Lückener HG, Peters PE. Mediastinal tumors: sensitivity of detection with sonography compared with CT and radiography. Radiology 1990; 175:137–143.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hirche TO, Wagner TO, Dietrich CF. Mediastinal ultrasound: technique and possible applications. Med Klin (Munich) 2002; 97:472–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wernecke K, Diederich S. Sonographic features of mediastinal tumors. Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163:1357–1364.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Diacon AH, Schuurmans MM, Theron J, Schubert PT, Wright CA, Bolliger CT. Safety and yield of ultrasound-assisted transthoracic biopsy performed by pulmonologists. Respiration 2004; 71:519–522.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bahr HM, Shafey MH, Hantera MS, Abo-Elmagd G, El-Batsh AH. Ultrasound guided needle pleural biopsy in patients with undiagnosed pleural effusion. Egypt J Chest Dis Tuberc 2014; 63:113–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Blank W: Interventional chest sonography. In Chest sonography. Edited by Mathis G. Springer-Verlag; 2011:187–209.

  26. Anderson JM, Murchison J, Patel D. CT-guided lung biopsy: factors influencing diagnostic yield and complication rate. Clin Radiol 2003; 58:791–797.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Montaudon M, Latrabe V, Pariente A, Corneloup O, Begueret H, Laurent F. Factors influencing accuracy of CT-guided percutaneous biopsies of pulmonary lesions. Eur Radiol 2004; 14:1234–1240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gupta S, Krishnamurthy S, Broemeling LD, Morello FAJr, Wallace MJ, Ahrar K, et al. Small (≤2 cm) subpleural pulmonary lesions: short-versus long-needle-path CT-guided biopsy-comparison of diagnostic yields and complications. Radiology 2005; 234:631–637.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Geraghty PR, Kee ST, McFarlane G, Razavi MK, Sze DY, Dake MD. CT-guided transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy of pulmonary nodules: needle size and pneumothorax rate. Radiology 2003; 229:475–481.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yildirim E, Kirbas I, Harman A, Ozyer U, Tore HG, Aytekin C, et al. CT-guided cutting needle lung biopsy using modified coaxial technique: factors effecting risk of complications. Eur J Radiol 2009; 70:57–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wu CC, Maher MM, Shepard JA. Complications of CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy of the chest: prevention and management. Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196:W678–W682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Cao BS, Wu JH, Li XL, Deng J, Liao GQ. Sonographically guided transthoracic biopsy of peripheral lung and mediastinal lesions: role of contrast-enhanced sonography. J Ultrasound Med 2011; 30:1479– 1490.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wiener RS, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Welch HG. Population-based risk for complications after transthoracic needle lung biopsy of a pulmonary nodule: an analysis of discharge records. Ann Intern Med 2011; 155: 137–144.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departments of Chest, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, El-Geish Street, Tanta, Egypt

    Wafaa S. El-Shimy, Fawzy A. El-Emery, Ayman H. Abd El-Zaher & Dalia E. El-Sharawy

  2. Departments of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt

    Amr M. El-Badry

Authors
  1. Wafaa S. El-Shimy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fawzy A. El-Emery
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ayman H. Abd El-Zaher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Amr M. El-Badry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Dalia E. El-Sharawy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dalia E. El-Sharawy.

Additional information

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

El-Shimy, W.S., El-Emery, F.A., Abd El-Zaher, A.H. et al. The diagnostic value of ultrasound-guided percutaneous transthoracic core-needle biopsy versus computed tomography-guided biopsy in peripheral intrathoracic lesions. Egypt J Bronchol 10, 12–19 (2016). https://doi.org/10.4103/1687-8426.176660

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1687-8426.176660

Keywords