Skip to main content

Use of a small bore pleural catheter in the managemen of patients with malignant pleural effusion

Abstract

Background

Malignant pleural effusions (MPEs) can produce significant respiratory symptoms and decreased quality of life in patients with terminal malignancies; palliation of respiratory symptoms can be performed by several different approaches, but a minimally invasive procedure to provide relief of respiratory symptoms would be optimal.

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the usage of a small bore catheter in outpatients as an alternative, effective, and safe method to the traditionally large bore chest tube in the management of MPE.

Patients and methods

Fifty patients with MPE were grouped randomly into two groups according to the method of drainage.

Results

The results showed that there were significant statistical differences in the results of both groups as the duration of catheter was 4 (3–5) days to 11 (10–10.25) days in the chest tube group; the cost of hospital and medication was 780±1400 LE in the pleural catheter group, whereas in the chest tube group, it was 11 520±1895.61 LE and the total cost was 5520±17 600 in the pleural catheter group and 14 020.00 ±1895.61 LE in the chest tube group. The modified Borg scale for dyspnea after insertion showed a 43% improvement in dyspnea in the small bore pleural catheter group compared with 41% in the chest tube group.

Conclusion

On the basis of the results of this study and other studies, we conclude that a small bore catheter is as effective and safe as a large bore chest tube in the treatment of MPEs and use in the outpatient clinic led to few complications.

References

  1. American Thoracic Society. Management of malignant pleural effusions. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162:1987–2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Snchez-Armengol A, Rodrguez-Panadero F. Survival and talc pleurodesis in metastatic pleural carcinoma, revisited. Report of 125 cases. Chest 1993; 104:1482–1485.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rahman NM, Ali NJ, Brown G, et al. Local anaesthetic thoracoscopy: British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline 2010. Thorax 2010; 65:54–60.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clive AO, Bhatnagar R, Psallidas I, et al. Individualised management of malignant pleural effusion. Lancet Respir Med 2015; 3: 505–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Haas A, Sterman D, Musani A. Malignant pleural effusions: management options with consideration of coding, billing, and a decision approach. Chest 2007; 132:1036–1041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Anderson CB, Philipott GW, Ferguson TB. The treatment of malignant pleural effusions. Cancer 1974; 33:916–922.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Heffner JE, Nietert P, Barbieri C. Pleural fluid pH as a predictor of pleurodesis failure. Chest 2000; 117:87–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tremblay A, Mason C, Michaud G. Use of tunneled catheters for malignant pleural effusions in patients fit for pleurodesis. Eur Respir J 2007; 30:759–762.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chang YC, Patz EF, Goodman PC. Pneumothorax after small-bore catheter placement for malignant pleural effusions. Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166:1049–1105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kendrick K, Baxi S, Smith R. Usefulness of the modified 0-12-Borg scale in assessing the degree of dyspnea in patients with COPD and asthma. J Emerg Nurs Vol 2000; 26:216–222.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bediwy AS, Amer HG. Pigtail catheter use for draining pleural effusions of various etiologies. Int Sch Res Net 2012; 2012:143295.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Putnam JB Jr, Light RW, Rodriguez RM. A randomized comparison of indwelling pleural catheter and doxycycline pleurodesis in the management of malignant pleural effusions. Cancer 1999; 86:1992–1999.

  13. Davis H, Mishra E, Khahan B, Harrison R. Effect of an indwelling pleural catheter vs chest tube and talc pleurodesis for relieving dyspnea in patients with malignant pleural effusion. JAMA 2012; 307:2383–2389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Belani CP, Pajeau TS, Bennett CL. Treating malignant pleural effusion cost consciously. Chest 1998; 113:78S–85S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lynch T. Management of malignant pleural effusions. Chest 1993; 103:385–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sahn S. Use of fibrinolytic agents in the management of complicated parapneumonic effusions and empyemas. Thorax 1998; 532:65–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Colt HG. Thoracoscopic management of malignant pleural effusions. Clin Chest Med 1995; 16:505–518.

  18. Grodzin C, Balk R. Indwelling small pleural catheter needle thoracentesis in the management of large pleural effusions. Chest 1997; 111:981–988.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Musani A, Haas A, Seijo L, Wilby M. Outpatient management of malignant pleural effusions with small-bore, tunneled pleural catheters. Respiration 2004; 71:559–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Abdel Maguid R, Khaled S, Moustafa F, Ahmed Yossef G. Comparison between using small bore catheter and using the traditional chest tube application in the management of malignant pleural effusion. J Egypt Soc Cardiothorac Surg 2012; 20:3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Parker LA, Charnock GC, Delany DJ. Small-bore catheter drainage and sclerotherapy for malignant pleural effusion. Cancer 1989; 64:1218–1221.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Seaton KG, Patz EF, Goodman PC. Palliative treatment of malignant pleural effusions: value of small-bore catheter thoracostomy and doxycycline sclerotherapy. Am J Roentgenol 1994; 164: 589–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Clementsen P, Evald T, Grode G, Hansen M, Krag Jacobsen G, Faurschou P. Treatment of malignant pleural effusion: pleurodesis using a small percutaneous catheter. A prospective randomized study. Respir Med 1998; 92:593–596.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Walsh FW, Albert MW, Solomon DA. Malignant pleural effusion: pleurodesis using a small bore percauteneous catheter. South Med J 1989; 82:963–966.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dina R. Abd El Sadek Msc.

Additional information

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work noncommercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Farrag, M.A., Sharkawy, S.H., Diab, H.S. et al. Use of a small bore pleural catheter in the managemen of patients with malignant pleural effusion. Egypt J Bronchol 11, 209–214 (2017). https://doi.org/10.4103/ejb.ejb_21_17

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ejb.ejb_21_17

Keywords