Skip to main content
  • Review article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Role of bronchoscopy in diagnosis of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality in many developing countries including India. Prompt and accurate establishment of diagnosis is one of the essential basic principles of care for persons with TB. Sputum smear microscopy and culture remain the cornerstone of diagnosis but can be negative in a substantial proportion of pulmonary TB patients (multiple smear-negative status or scanty sputum). Bronchoscopy has been proven to be a safe and effective method for those patients with varying diagnostic yields ranging from 30 to 90%. Various specimens are obtained from a fiber-optic bronchoscope such as smear and culture for mycobacteria from the bronchial aspirate or wash, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, bronchial brushing, postbronchoscopy sputum, transbronchial needle aspiration, and transbronchial biopsy. The diagnostic yield is significantly enhanced when nucleic acid amplification testing is applied to bronchoscopic specimens. The role of bronchoscopy in TB diagnosis is likely to be limited because of availability, cost, and logistical challenges. Future studies are needed to better define the role of the newer diagnostic modalities to improve early TB diagnosis.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2017. Geneva: WHO; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Merrick ST, Sepkowitz KA, Walsh J, Damson L, McKinley P, Jacobs JL. Comparison of induced versus expectorated sputum for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis by acid-fast smear. Am J Infect Control 1997;25: 463–466.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Iyer VN, Joshi AY, Boyce TG, Brutinel MW, Scalcini MC, Wilson JW, et al. Bronchoscopy in suspected pulmonary TB with negative induced-sputum smear and MTD Gen-probe testing. Respir Med 2011 105: 1084–1090.

  4. Nelson SM, Deike MA, Cartwright CP. Value of examining multiple sputum specimens in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36: 467–469.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Al Zahrani K, Al Jahdali H, Poirier L, Rene P, Menzies D. Yield of smear, culture and amplification tests from repeated sputum induction for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2001;5: 855–860.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bell D, Leckie V, McKendrick M. Use of the induced sputum procedure in the investigation of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis 2004;38: 1504–1505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ganguly KC, Hiron MM, Mridha ZU, Biswas M, Hassan MK, Saha SC, et al. Comparison of sputum induction with bronchoalveolar lavage in the diagnosis of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis. Mymensingh Med J 2008; 17: 115–123.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schoch OD, Rieder P, Tueller C, Altpeter E, Zellweger JP, Rieder HL, et al. Diagnostic yield of sputum, induced sputum, and bronchoscopy after radiologic tuberculosis screening. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007; 175: 80–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mondoni M, Repossi A, Carlucci P, Centanni S, Sotgiu G. Bronchoscopic techniques in the management of patients with tuberculosis. Int J Infect Dis 2017; 64: 27–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Burman WJ, Reves RR. Review of false-positive cultures for Mycobacterium tuberculosis and recommendations for avoiding unnecessary treatment. Clin Infect Dis 2000; 31: 1390–1395.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. de Gracia J, Curull V, Vidal R, Riba A, Orriols R, Martin N, et al. Diagnostic value of bronchoalveolar lavage in suspected pulmonary tuberculosis. Chest 1988; 93: 329–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bachh AA, Gupta R, Haq I, Varudkar HG. Diagnosing sputum/smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis: does fibreoptic bronchoscopy play a significant role? Lung India 2010; 27: 58–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rachow A, Zumla A, Heinrich N, Rojas-Ponce G, Mtafya B, Reither K, et al. Rapid and accurate detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum samples by Cepheid Xpert MTB/RIF assay: a clinical validation study. PLoS ONE 2011; 6: e20458.

  14. Barnard DA, Irusen EM, Bruwer JW, Plekker D, Whitelaw AC, Deetlefs JD. The utility of Xpert MTB/RIF performed on bronchial washings obtained in patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis in a high prevalence setting. BMC Pulm Med 2015; 15: 103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abhijeet Singh MD, DNB, DM.

Additional information

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prasad, R., Singh, A. Role of bronchoscopy in diagnosis of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis. Egypt J Bronchol 13, 1–5 (2019). https://doi.org/10.4103/ejb.ejb_34_18

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ejb.ejb_34_18

Keywords