Skip to main content
  • Original article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Study of diaphragmatic mobility by chest ultrasound and echocardiographic changes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients on different modes of mechanical ventilation

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to assess diaphragmatic mobility by chest ultrasonography and echocardiographic changes in mechanically ventilated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients on different modes of mechanical ventilation.

Patients and methods

The present study was carried out on 50 mechanically ventilated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Chest ultrasonography for the assessment of diaphragmatic mobility in addition to echocardiography was performed on different modes of mechanical ventilation in the same session at any time since mechanical ventilation.

Results

There was a highly statistically significant relation between diaphragmatic excursion and different modes of mechanical ventilation, where excursion increased significantly, with its peak at pressure-support ventilation (PSV). In terms of diaphragmatic thickness, the thickness of diaphragm decreased significantly at PSV. No significant correlation was detected between echocardiography in Ejection fraction, right ventricular systolic pressure, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, and different modes of mechanical ventilation.

Conclusion

The best diaphragmatic mobility was on PSV, which improved lung volumes and ventilation, and may accelerate the weaning process. In addition, we concluded that the echocardiographic finding was not affected by different modes of mechanical ventilation.

References

  1. Iwasawa T, Kagei S, Gotoh T, Yoshiike Y, Matsushita K, Kurihara H, et al. Magnetic resonance analysis of abnormal diaphragmatic motion in patients with emphysema. Eur Respir J 2002;19:225–231.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ferrari G, Filippi G, Elia F, Panero F, Volpicelli G, Aprà F. Diaphragm ultrasound as a new index of discontinuation from mechanical ventilation. Crit Ultrasound J 2014;2014:6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Grosu HB, Lee YI, Lee J, Eden E, Eikermann M, Rose K. Diaphragm muscle thinning in mechanically ventilated patients. Chest 2012;142:1455–1460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Loubieres Y, Vieillard-Baron A, Beauchet A, Fourme T, Page B, Jardin F. Echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular function in critically ill patients:dynamic loading challenge using medical antishock trousers. Chest 2000;118:1718–1723.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Saeed AM, El Assal GI, Ali TM, Hendawy MM. Role of ultrasound in assessment of diaphragmatic function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients during weaning from mechanical ventilation. Egypt J Broncho 2016;10:167–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boussuges A, Gole Y, Blanc P. Diaphragmatic motion studied by M-mode ultrasonography:methods, reproducibility, and normal values. Chest 2009;135:391–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-avi V. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults:an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2015;28:1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rudski LG, Lai WW, Afilalo J. Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults:a report from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010;23:685–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zoghbi WA, Enriques-Sarano M, Foster E. Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2003;16:777–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lancellotti P, Cosyns B. The EACVI Echo Handbook. New York:Oxford University Press; 2016.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Clinton M, Rebecca G. Clinical epidemiology and biostatistics. 3rd ed. Maryland:Williams & Wilkins; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Qaseem A, Wilt TJ,Weinberger SE, Hanania NA, Criner G, van der Molen T. Diagnosisandmanagement of stable chronicobstructive pulmonarydisease:a clinical practice guideline update from the American College of Physicians, American College of Chest Physicians, American Thoracic Society, and European Respiratory Society. Ann Intern Med 2011;155:179–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vivier E, Mekontso A, Dimassi S. Diaphragm ultrasonography to estimate the work of breathing during non-invasive ventilation. Intensive Care Med 2012;38:796–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dittoe N, Stultz D, Schwartz BP, Hahn HS. Quantitative left ventricular systolic function:from chamber to myocardium. Crit CareMed 2007; 35:330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. ElWahsh RA, Ahmed MK, Yaseen RI. Evaluation of left ventricular function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with or without pulmonary hypertension. Egypt J Chest Dis Tuber 2013;62:575–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Helala LA, ELMaraghy AA, ELBastawesy A. Review of chronic obstructive airway disease patients admitted at Maamoura Chest Hospital from2009 to 2012. Egypt J Chest Dis Tuberc 2016;65:49–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. El-Shabrawy M, Eldamanhory AS. Study of cardiovascular diseases in hospitalized AECOPD patients. Egypt J Chest Disease Tuberc 2017;66:17–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Umbrello M, Paolo F, Daniela L, Andrea G, Ilaria P, Angelo P, et al. Diaphragm ultrasound as indicator of respiratory effort in critically ill patients undergoing assisted mechanical ventilation:a pilot clinical study, Critical Care 2015; 19:161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Emmanuel V, Armand M, Saoussen D, Frederic V, Aissam L, Arnaud W, Laurent B. Diaphragm ultrasonography to estimate the work of breathing during non-invasive ventilation, Service de Re?animation Me? dicale, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Henri Mondor. Intensive Care Med 2012;38:796–803.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shereen F, Ali A. Diaphragm ultrasound as a new method to predict extubation outcome in mechanically ventilated patients. Egypt:Chest Department, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut Hospital; 2015. P. 7.

  21. Esteban A, Frutos F, Tobin MJ, Alia I, Solsona JF, Valverdu I, et al. A comparison of four methodsof weaning patients from mechanical ventilation Spanish Lung Failure Collaborative Group. N Engl J Med 1995;332:345–350.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. MacIntyre NR. Respiratory function during pressure support ventilation. Chest 1986;89:677–683.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hurst JM, Branson RD, Davis K Jr, Barrette RR. Cardiopulmonary effects of pressure support ventilation. Arch Surg 1989;124:1067–1070.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Brochard L, Harf A, Lorino H, Lemaire F. Inspiratory pressure support prevents diaphragmatic fatigue during weaning from mechanical ventilation. Am Rev Respir Dis 1989;139:513–521.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Luciele M, Silvia R, Janete S, Deise M, Alexandre Antonio N. Echocardiographic evaluation during weaning from mechanical ventilation. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2011;66:107–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Alexandre D, Marcelo M, Silvia R. Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre – Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre , RS – Brazil:Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation by Using Pressure Support or T-Tube Ventilation. Comparison between Patients with and without Heart Disease, Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia – Volume 85, Julho 2005.

  27. Caille V, Arniel JB, Charron C, Belliard G, Vieillard-Baron A, Vignon P. Echocardiography:a help in the weaning process. Crit Care 2010; 14:R120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cabello B, Thille AW, Roche-Campo F, Brochard L, Gomez FJ, Mancebo J. Physiological comparison of three spontaneous breathing trials in difficult-to-wean patients. Intensive Care Med 2010;36:1171–1179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samir M. Fahyim MBBCH, MSc.

Additional information

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saeed, A.M., Elshahed, G.S., Osman, N.M. et al. Study of diaphragmatic mobility by chest ultrasound and echocardiographic changes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients on different modes of mechanical ventilation. Egypt J Bronchol 12, 399–404 (2018). https://doi.org/10.4103/ejb.ejb_52_18

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ejb.ejb_52_18

Keywords