Skip to main content
  • Original article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Original, simplified, and modified pulmonary embolism severity indices in risk stratification of pulmonary embolism

Abstract

Background

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a potentially fatal disease. Prognostic assessment is needed for proper management. Several prognostic models have been proposed.

Aim

The aim was to validate the original pulmonary embolism severity index (o-PESI) with its simplified version (s-PESI) and modified version (m-PESI) as predictors of in-hospital mortality and homeostatic morbidities (nonlethal repeated venous thromboembolism, and/or nonlethal serious hemorrhage) in patients with PE.

Patients and methods

Patients proved to have acute PE admitted to Menoufia and Cairo University Hospitals between March 2017 and March 2019 were included in the study. The o-PESI, s-PESI, and m-PESI were calculated for each patient. In-hospital mortality, homeostatic morbidities, and major adverse events (mortality and homeostatic morbidities) were registered.

Results

One hundred and two patients were recruited. Inhospital mortality rate was 13.7%, morbidity rate was 21.6%, whereas major adverse events rate was 31%. The s-PESI classified 31.4% of patients as low risk, and none of them had in-hospital mortality. The frequencies of major adverse events in the low-risk groups were 31.2, 9.1, and 75% for o-PESI, s-PESI, and m-PESI, respectively. Difference between adverse events and non-adverse events groups was significant when s-PESI was applied (P=0.008). The s-PESI had the highest sensitivity and negative predictive value in detecting mortality, morbidity, and major adverse events compared with o-PESI and m-PESI. The area under the curve for s-PESI was significantly above the other two indices (area under the curve=0.78, P=0.04).

Conclusion

In addition to its easy application, the s-PESI has a preferably superior prognostic accuracy than o-PESI and m-PESI in prognostication of low-risk patients with acute PE.

References

  1. Tapson VF. Acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 2008; 358:1037–1052.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tagalakis V, Patenaude V, Kahn SR, Suissa S. Incidence of and mortality from venous thromboembolism in a real-world population: the Q-VTE Study Cohort. Am J Med 2013; 126:832.e13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen AT, Agnelli G, Anderson FA, Arcelus JI, Bergqvist D, Brecht JG, et al. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Europe. The number of VTE events and associated morbidity and mortality. Thromb Haemost 2007; 98:756–764.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Goldhaber SZ, Elliott CG. Acute pulmonary embolism: part I: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and diagnosis. Circulation 2003; 108:2726–2729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldhaber SZ, Visani L, De Rosa M. Acute pulmonary embolism: clinical outcomes in the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry (ICOPER). Lancet 1999; 353:1386–1389.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pengo V, Lensing AW, Prins MH, Marchiori A, Davidson BL, Tiozzo F, et al. Incidence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 2004; 350:2257–2264.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Spencer FA, Gore JM, Lessard D, Douketis JD, Emery C, Goldberg RJ. Patient outcomes after deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: the Worceste venous thromboembolism study. Arch Intern Med 2008; 168:425–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Klok FA, Zondag W, van Kralingen KW, van Dijk AP, Tamsma JT, Heyning FH, et al. Patient outcomes after acute pulmonary embolism. A pooled survival analysis of different adverse events. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010; 181:501–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Torbicki A, Perrier A, Konstantinides S, Agnelli G, Galiè N, Pruszczyk P, et al. Guidelines on diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J 2008; 29:2276–2315.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lankeit M, Gómez V, Wagner C, Aujesky D, Recio M, Briongos S, et al. A strategy combining imaging and laboratory biomarkers in comparison with a simplified clinical score for risk stratification of patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Chest 2012; 141:916–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wicki J, Perrier A, Perneger TV, Bounameaux H, Junod AF. Predicting adverse outcome in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: a risk score. Thromb Haemost 2000; 84:548–552.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Aujesky D, Obrosky DS, Stone RA, Auble TE, Perrier A, Cornuz J, et al. Derivation and validation of a prognostic model for pulmonary embolism. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005; 172:1041–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Uresandi F, Otero R, Cayuela A, Cabezudo MA, Jiménez D, Laserna E, et al. A clinical prediction rule for identifying short-term risk of adverse events in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism [in Spanish]. Arch Bronconeumol 2007; 43:617–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Davies CW, Wimperis J, Green ES, Pendry K, Killen J, Mehdi I, et al. Early discharge of patients with pulmonary embolism: a two-phase observational study. Eur Respir J 2007; 30:708–714.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Murugappan M, Johnson JA, Gage BF, Jimenez D, Bhalla S, Brown K, et al. Home Management Exclusion (HOME) criteria for initial treatment of acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008; 177: A182.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jiménez D, Yusen RD. Prognostic models for selecting patients with acute pulmonary embolism for initial outpatient therapy. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2008; 14:414–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Aujesky D, Perrier A, Roy PM, Stone RA, Cornuz J, Meyer G, et al. Validation of a clinical prognostic model to identify low-risk patients with pulmonary embolism. J Intern Med 2007; 261:597–604.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jiménez D, Yusen RD, Otero R, Uresandi F, Nauffal D, Laserna E, et al. Prognostic models for selecting patients with acute pulmonary embolism for initial outpatient therapy. Chest 2007; 132:24–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jiménez D, Aujesky D, Moores L, Uresandi F, Nauffal D, Laserna E, et al. Simplification of pulmonary embolism severity index for prognostication in patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med 2010; 170:1383–1389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ostovan MA, Ghaffari S, Pourafkari L, Dehghani P, Hajizadeh R, Nadiri M, et al. Modification of simplified pulmonary embolism severity index and its prognostic value in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Heart, Lung and Circulation 2016; 25:184–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Wattinne L, Giraud F. Central pulmonary thromboembolism: diagnosis with spiral volumetric CT with the single-breath-hold-technique-comparison with pulmonary angiography. Radiology 1992; 185:381–387.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kilic T, Gunen H, Gulbas G, Hacievliyagil SS, Ozer A. Prognostic role of simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index and the European Society of Cardiology Prognostic Model in short- and long-term risk stratification in pulmonary embolism. Pak J Med Sci 2014; 30:1259–1264.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Coutance G, Cauderlier E, Ehtisham J, Hamon M, Hamon M. The prognostic value of markers of right ventricular dysfunction in pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis. Crit care 2011; 2:R103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. West J, Goodacre S, Sampson F. The value of clinical features in the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism: systematic review and metaanalysis. QJM 2007; 100:763–769.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ozsu S, Abul Y, Orem A, Oztuna F, Bulbul Y, Yaman H, et al. Predictive value of troponins and simplified pulmonary embolism severity index in patients with normotensive pulmonary embolism. Multidiscip Respir Med 2013; 8:34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jones CM, Athanasiou T. Summary receiver operating characteristic curve analysis techniques in the evaluation of diagnostic tests. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 79:16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhou XY, Ben SQ, Chen HL, Ni SS. The prognostic value of pulmonary embolism severity index in acute pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis. Respir Res 2012; 13:111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maha Yousif MD.

Additional information

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yousif, M., Hussein, S.A. Original, simplified, and modified pulmonary embolism severity indices in risk stratification of pulmonary embolism. Egypt J Bronchol 13, 747–753 (2019). https://doi.org/10.4103/ejb.ejb_68_19

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ejb.ejb_68_19

Keywords