Skip to main content
  • Original article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Sonographic measurement of lung aeration versus rapid shallow breathing index as a predictor of successful weaning from mechanical ventilation

Abstract

Background

Lung ultrasonography is a beneficial tool for evaluation of the extent of lung aeration through measurement of the amount of extravascular lung water. Lung ultrasonography offers some advantages over other methods of assessment of lung aeration including the lack of ionizing radiation and the possibility of use at patient’s bedside. It facilitates dynamic assessment of the lung during mechanical ventilation and during weaning.

Aim

To assess lung aeration by lung ultrasonography in patients ready for weaning and to validate the significance of its use as a predictor of weaning outcome in comparison with rapid shallow breathing index.

Patients and methods

A prospective observational study was conducted on 30 critically ill mechanically ventilated patients for 48 h or more, and ready to undergo spontaneous breathing trial (SBT), according to the readiness criteria. It was conducted in Beni-Suef University Hospital from October 2017 to May 2018. Rapid shallow breathing index was measured before initiation of SBT, and lung ultrasound was done, before, during, and after SBT [lung ultrasound score (LUS) 1, 2, and 3] and were used as predictors for SBT outcome. Patients were divided, according to outcome, into successful weaning group (group A) and failed weaning group (group B).

Results

In the failed weaning group, LUS1, LUS2, and LUS3 were significantly higher than those of the successful weaning group. At cutoff value of 8.5, LUS3 could be used for prediction of weaning failure with sensitivity 85% and specificity 100%. Moreover, there was a statistically significant relation between LUS and the other variables including hospital stay, mechanical ventilation duration, and mortality.

Conclusion

Lung ultrasound is useful as a bedside tool that can help physicians in their weaning decisions.

References

  1. Soni N, Williams P. Positive pressure ventilation: what is the real cost? Br J Anaesth 2008; 101:446–457.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Epstein SK, Ciubotaru RL, Wong JB. Effect of failed extubation on the outcome of mechanical ventilation. Chest 1997; 112:186–192.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brochard L, Rauss A, Benito S, Conti G, Mancebo J, Rekik N, et al. Comparison of three methods of gradual withdrawal from ventilatory support during weaning from mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994; 150:896–903.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rothaar RC, Epstein SK. Extubation failure: magnitude of the problem, impact on outcomes, and prevention. Curr Opin Crit Care 2003; 9:59–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tobin MJ. Principles and practice of mechanical ventilation. Shock 2006; 26:426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Heunks LM, van der Hoeven JG. Clinical review: The ABC of weaning failure – a structured approach. Crit Care 2010; 14:245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferrer M, Valencia M, Nicolas JM, Bernadich O, Badia JR, Torres A. Early noninvasive ventilation averts extubation failure in patients at risk: a randomized trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 173:164–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Teixeira C, Maccari JG, Vieira SRR, Oliveira RP, Savi A, Machado ASA, et al. Impact of a mechanical ventilation weaning protocol on the extubation failure rate in difficult-to-wean patients. J Bras Pneumol 2012; 38:364–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Arbelot C, Ferrari F, Bouhemad B, Rouby JJ. Lung ultrasound in acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute lung injury. Curr Opin Crit Care 2008; 14:70–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bouhemad B, Zhang M, Lu Q, Rouby JJ. Clinical review: bedside lung ultrasound in critical care practice. Crit Care 2007; 11:205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Soldati G, Sher S. Bedside lung ultrasound in critical care practice. Minerva Anestesiol 2009; 75:509.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Boles JM, Bion J, Connors A, Herridge M, Marsh B, Melot C, et al. Weaning from mechanical ventilation. Eur Respir J 2007; 29:1033–1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Putensen C, Theuerkauf N, Zinserling J, Wrigge H, Pelosi P. Metaanalysis: ventilation strategies and outcomes of the acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute lung injury. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151:566–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Koraaa EEDAW, Alya TM, Husseinb HS, Besharac SK. The role of chest ultrasound in detection of pulmonary congestion in hemodialysis patients. Egypt J Bronchol 2018; 12:482–485.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Osman AM, Hashim RM. Diaphragmatic and lung ultrasound application as new predictive indices for the weaning process in ICU patients. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 2017; 48:61–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tenza-Lozano E, Llamas-Alvarez A, Jaimez-Navarro E, FernĂ¡ndez-SĂ¡nchez J. Lung and diaphragm ultrasound as predictors of success in weaning from mechanical ventilation. Crit Ultrasound J 2018; 10:12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Haji K, Haji D, Canty DJ, Royse AG, Green C, Royse CF. The impact of heart, lung and diaphragmatic ultrasound on prediction of failed extubation from mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients: a prospective observational pilot study. Crit Ultrasound J 2018; 10:13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shoaeir M, Noeam K, Mahrous A, Alaa A. Lung aeration loss as a predictor of reintubation using lung ultrasound in mechanically ventilated patients. Biolife 2016; 4:514–520.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Soummer A, Perbet S, Brisson H, Arbelot C, Constantin JM, Lu Q, et al. Ultrasound assessment of lung aeration loss during a successful weaning trial predicts postextubation distress. Crit Care Med 2012; 40:2064–2072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Banerjee A, Mehrotra G. Comparison of lung ultrasound-based weaning indices with rapid shallow breathing index: Are they helpful? Indian J Crit Care Med 2018; 22:435–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tierney DM, Boland LL, Overgaard JD, Huelster JS, Jorgenson A, Normington JP, et al. Pulmonary ultrasound scoring system for intubated critically ill patients and its association with clinical metrics and mortality: a prospective cohort study. J Clin Ultrasound 2018; 46:14–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Radwa M. Abdelwahab MSc.

Additional information

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Laz, N.I., Mohammad, M.F., Abdelsalam, S.M. et al. Sonographic measurement of lung aeration versus rapid shallow breathing index as a predictor of successful weaning from mechanical ventilation. Egypt J Bronchol 13, 477–483 (2019). https://doi.org/10.4103/ejb.ejb_7_19

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ejb.ejb_7_19

Keywords