Skip to main content

Comparison of methods to quantitate spontaneous pneumothorax — A study from a tertiary care hospital

Abstract

Background

Pneumothorax can present as a respiratory emergency and has varied etiology. However, literature available on assessment and management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) based on radiological quantitation is scarce. This study was undertaken to compare two different methods of quantitating pneumothorax size with that recommended in American Thoracic Society (ATS) guideline on chest radiogram with respect to possible change in management practices.

Patients and methods

A prospective cohort of adults presenting with spontaneous pneumothorax (SP) over 3 years to Emergency and Pulmonology Department, St John’s Medical College Hospital, Bangalore, was included. Demographic characteristics and clinical presentation were compiled. Management of SP was based on ATS guidelines. PSP size on chest radiogram was requantitated in the included patients using Light’s index and Collin’s method and was compared with that proposed by the ATS guideline.

Results

Seventy-six participants with SP were studied; their mean age was 43.7 years, with a preponderance of male patients (84.2%). Twenty-four (31.6%) patients had PSP and 52 (68.4%) patients had secondary spontaneous pneumothorax. In PSP, there was poor agreement between various methods of estimating size of pneumothorax on chest radiogram (Kappa statistic=0.23; ICC of 0.263). Three (12.5%) of the 24 incidences of PSP, which were treated conservatively as per ATS guidelines, would have required invasive intervention if Light’s index or the Collin’s formula were taken into consideration.

Conclusion

There was poor agreement of radiological pneumothorax size estimation by Collin’s, Light’s, and that proposed in the ATS guidelines. Thus, a unified, standardized method of radiological assessment of PSP is required.

References

  1. Noppen M, De Keukeleire T. Pneumothorax. Respiration 2008; 76:121–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Collins CD, Lopez A, Mathie A, Wood V, Jackson JE, Roddie ME, et al. Quantification of pneumothorax size on chest radiographs using lnterpleural distances:regression analysis based on volume measurements from helical CT. Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165: 1127–1130.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rhea JT, DeLuca SA, Greene RE. Determining the size of pneumothorax in the upright patient. Radiology 1982; 144:733–736.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Baumann MH, Strange C, Heffner JE, Light R, Kirby TJ, Klein J, et al. Management of spontaneous pneumothorax:an American College of Chest Physicians Delphi consensus statement. Chest 2001; 119:590–602.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Light RW. Management of spontaneous pneumothorax. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993; 148:245–248.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. MacDuff A, Arnold A, Harvey J. Management of spontaneous pneumothorax:British Thoracic Society pleural disease guideline2010. Thorax 2010; 65:ii18–ii31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Light RW. Pleural controversy:optimal chest tube size for drainage. Respirology 2011; 16:244–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chaturvedi A, Lee S, Klionsky N, Chaturvedi A. Demystifying the persistent pneumothorax:role of imaging. Insights Imaging 2016; 7:411–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Boghani ABPRB. Spontaneous pneumothorax – a clinical study. Lung India 1985; 3:37–40.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gupta D, Mishra S, Faruqi S, Aggarwal AN. Aetiology and clinical profile of spontaneous pneumothorax in adults. 2006/09/15. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci 2006; 48:261–264.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dhua A, Chaudhuri AD, Kundu S, Tapadar SR, Bhuniya S, Ghosh B, et al. Assessment of spontaneous pneumothorax in adults in a tertiary care hospital. Lung India 2015; 32:132–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Choi W-I. Pneumothorax. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul) 2014; 76:99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kelly A-MM, Weldon D, Tsang AYLL, Graham CA. Comparison between two methods for estimating pneumothorax size from chest X-rays. 2006/ 01/13. Respir Med 2006; 100:1356–1359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Salazar AJ, Aguirre DA, Ocampo J, Camacho JC, Díaz XA. Evaluation of three pneumothorax size quantification methods on digitized chest X-ray films using medical-gradegrayscale and consumer-grade color displays. J Digit Imaging 2014; 27:280–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nikolić MZ, Lok LSC, Mattishent K, Barth S, Yung B, Cummings NM, et al. Noninterventional statistical comparison of BTS and CHEST guidelines for size and severity in primary pneumothorax. Eur Respir J 2015; 45:1731–1734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schoenenberger RA, Haefeli WE, Weiss P, Ritz RF. Timing of invasive procedures in therapy for primary and secondary spontaneous pneumothorax. Arch Surg 1991; 126:764–766.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Baumgaertel MW, Kraemer M, Berlit P. Neurologic complications of acute and chronic renal disease. Handb Clin Neurol 2013; 119:383–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tschopp J-M, Rami-Porta R, Noppen M, Astoul P. Management of spontaneous pneumothorax:state of the art. Eur Respir J 2006; 28:637–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Grippi MA, Fishman JA, Kotloff RM, Pack AI. Pneumothorax. In:Grippi MA, editor. Fishman’s pulmonary diseases and disorders. 5th ed. New Delhi:McGraw-Hill Education; 2015. p 2591–2631.

  20. Kelly A-MM, Druda D. Comparison of size classification of primary spontaneous pneumothorax by three international guidelines:a case for international consensus? Respir Med 2008; 102:1830–1832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uma Devaraj DNB (Med, Respiratory Diseases).

Additional information

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Devaraj, U., Ramachandran, P., Krishnaswamy, U. et al. Comparison of methods to quantitate spontaneous pneumothorax — A study from a tertiary care hospital. Egypt J Bronchol 13, 388–393 (2019). https://doi.org/10.4103/ejb.ejb_93_18

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ejb.ejb_93_18

Keywords