Skip to main content
The Egyptian Journal of Bronchology
Download PDF

Blood and sputum eosinophilia in COPD exacerbation

The Egyptian Journal of Bronchology volume 16, Article number: 49 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Exacerbations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are major contributors to worsening lung function, impaired quality of life, emergency healthcare use, and COPD-related mortality. COPD exacerbations are heterogeneous in terms of airway inflammation and etiology.

Objectives

To assess the relation between blood and sputum eosinophils and COPD exacerbation.

Subjects and methods

Prospective cohort study, conducted on 100 COPD patients presented in outpatient clinic. All patients were subjected to medical history including: occupational history, smoking history, comorbidity, number of exacerbations in last year and their degree, history of admission in the last year and treatment taken for COPD. Modified Medical Research Council scale of dyspnea, peak expiratory flow rate, oxygen saturation using pulse oximetry. Complete blood count with differential eosinophilic count. Sputum sample differential cell count was done.

Results

The eosinophil level in blood before and after treatment showed a significant positive correlation with the number of hospital admission in the last year (r = 0.29; P = 0.003 and r = 0.3; P = 0.002, respectively). Regarding the eosinophil level either in blood or in sputum, it showed significant statistical elevation in patients not using steroid treatment in comparison to patients who used systemic or inhaled steroid treatments (P < 0.001 and 0.004, respectively).

Conclusion

Blood eosinophil count can be used as a severity marker of COPD exacerbations. The eosinophil levels, either in blood or sputum, were significantly correlated with the degree of exacerbation. Sputum eosinophilia can also predict the risk of hospitalization. In addition, blood eosinophil count can direct the use of oral corticosteroids in exacerbation.

Introduction

Exacerbations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are major contributors to worsening lung function, impaired quality of life, emergency healthcare use, and COPD-related mortality [1].

Even though COPD is habitually considered as inflammation mediated by neutrophils, eosinophils are present in the sputum and blood of some patients with COPD, whether during stable disease or acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) [2,3,4]. The phenotype of COPD, which is associated with elevated eosinophil counts, showed a severe exacerbation form with long stay time in hospital and a higher readmission rate [5].

The frequency of AECOPD seems to be related to blood eosinophil level and seems to worsen in patients not receiving ICS and was more marked for severe events [6].

Objectives

To assess the relation between blood and sputum eosinophils and COPD exacerbation.

Methods

Study design and population

This is a prospective cohort study conducted on 100 COPD patients who admitted or presented in the outpatient clinic of Abbasia Chest Hospital from January 2018 to October 2018 for exacerbation of COPD.

Exclusion criteria

  • History of conditions known to cause eosinophilia, e.g., drug allergies and parasitic infestations

  • Other eosinophilic pulmonary diseases as asthma, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, and hyper-eosinophilic syndrome

Patient’s evaluation

  • All patients were asked about their occupational history, smoking history and index [7], comorbidity, number of exacerbations in the last year and their degree, and history of hospital admission in the last year

  • Complete clinical examination, including Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale of dyspnea [8], peak expiratory flow rate, and oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry

  • Laboratory investigation including complete blood count (CBC) with differential count (eosinophilic count), liver function test (SGOT and SGPT), kidney function test (urea and creatinine), and sodium and potassium levels

  • Sputum and blood cytology: The sputum sample was collected at the time of presentation and after treatment, and the differential cell count was evaluated as Hastie et al. methods, 2017; hence, the patients were considered to be eosinophilic if the sputum level exceeds 2% and there is blood eosinophilia of 0.3 × 109 cells/L or greater [9].

Statistical methods

The data were collected and statistically analyzed by Minitab 17.1.0.0 for windows (Minitab Inc., 2013, PA, USA). Continuous data are presented as mean and SD and categorical data as number and percentage; the normality of data was examined using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Comparison between two continuous groups was done using an independent t test. A Pearson correlation coefficient was used to estimate the linear relationship between two or more numerical variables; the sign before the “r” represents the direction of the relationship. All tests were two-sided, and P was considered significant if < 0.05.

Results

The demographic characters of patients are summarized in Table 1, the mean (SD) age of patients was 59 (10) years, most of them were males (86%) and smoker (70%). The mean (SD) smoking index was 447 (234). More than half (51%) of patients showed compensated ABG. The dyspnea scale-mMRC mean was 3.17+/- 0.91, the mean peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) was 307.95 mL, (64%) of cases showed blood eosinophilia, and (51%) had sputum eosinophilia (Fig. 1). The mean (SD) level of eosinophils in blood and sputum was 5.21±3.98 and 3.89±4.16 ×103 μL/mL, respectively, and ranged from (0.47–19.9) and (0–20) ×103 μL/mL, respectively, as shown in Table 2.

Table 1 Demographic data of patients
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Eosinophilic phenotype in COPD cases

Full size image
Table 2 Eosinophilic count in blood and sputum and respiratory parameter assessment of patients
Full size table

Both eosinophil levels in blood and in sputum were significantly higher in groups with severe COPD exacerbation than in mild and moderate groups (P < 0.001), as in Table 3.

Table 3 Correlation between the “E” level in blood and sputum with exacerbation severity
Full size table

Repeated admission was significantly and positively correlated with sputum eosinophils (r = 0.28; P = 0.004 and r = 0.26; P = 0.008) respectively (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Correlation between “E” levels in sputum with number of admissions in the last year

Full size image

Almost all (83%) of cases were treated by steroids, and only 17% refused steroid therapy in management as mentioned in Table 4; the group that was treated by steroid therapy either systemic or inhaler had a significantly lower level of eosinophils in blood and sputum than the other group, P < 0.001 and 0.004, respectively.

Table 4 Correlation between the “E” level in blood and sputum with steroid treatment
Full size table

Discussion

COPD is a mixed condition that involved many clinical and pathophysiological mechanisms, which showed a degree of variation in its severity in between the patients [10]. This mixture induced much variability in the responses to pharmacological treatments. Biomarkers that predict treatment responses to anti-inflammatory drugs may be useful for augmenting the benefit versus hazard ratio [11].

In COPD patients, sputum eosinophil counts predict the clinical outcome of corticosteroids [12]. On the other hand, using sputum eosinophils as a marker needs a time for induction; besides, some patients were incapable of giving adequate samples. For these reasons, measuring blood eosinophils is more convenient and appears to be a surrogate biomarker for sputum eosinophils as these measurements show a degree of correlation within the same individual, both in stable COPD patients and during exacerbations [13, 14].

In the current study, the level of eosinophils in blood at examination time was 0.521 cells × 109/L, which was slightly higher than Couillard et al.’s study [15], as the estimated level of blood eosinophils was 0.1 cells × 109/L in total cases and 0.3 cells × 109/L in eosinophilic groups. Another study [16] found that 17.9% of patients had a relative blood eosinophil level > 0.3 cells × 109/L, while the rest of the patients were below that level.

In correlating the blood and sputum eosinophils with exacerbation severity, the data showed significant statistical elevation in severe exacerbation groups than in mild to moderate groups, P < 0.001 for all. In addition, the level of eosinophils in sputum was significantly correlated positively with the number of admission to hospital in the last year (r = 0.28; P = 0.004 and r = 0.26; P = 0.008), respectively, which came in harmony with Couillard et al.’s results [15], who recorded that 55 of 167 COPD cases had higher blood eosinophils; besides, the higher eosinophil level was associated with increasing the risk of readmission three times more than the other patients with lower eosinophils and gave a conclusion that blood eosinophils could be used as a marker of severe COPD exacerbation with higher readmission rate. Yun et al. [17] agreed and concluded that blood eosinophils ≥ 0.3 cells × 109/L were associated with increased exacerbation frequency.

The value of high blood eosinophils in predicting the exacerbation risk in COPD has also been examined in a recent large population study, which showed that the risk of both moderate and severe exacerbations was increased with higher eosinophil counts, but the effect was more pronounced in the severe exacerbation group. This might indicate that these patients may have a distinct inflammatory profile, making them more susceptible to developing severe events [18, 19].

The current study reported that blood and sputum eosinophils were significantly higher in patients who did not receive systemic or inhaled steroids rather than patients who received systemic or inhaled steroids, P < 0.001 and 0.004, respectively. A recent post hoc analysis [20] confirmed the use of the peripheral blood eosinophil counts as a predictor of exacerbation risk and ICS treatment response in patients with COPD. Another contrary study [16] included 32,693 COPD patients to evaluate the correlation between the blood eosinophil level and the related risk of hospitalization and mortality, besides examining the impact of ICS in admission rate or mortality. The results revealed that there were insignificant impacts of both high blood eosinophil level and ICS use, on both readmission and mortality rate. A recent study [21] included 493 cases with COPD reporting that patients with lower eosinophil counts experienced poorer clinical outcomes, and eosinophil levels may be a helpful marker to predict outcomes in AECOPD. The better outcome may be related to a better response to systemic steroids in the eosinophilic group [22].

Cai and Wang [21] concluded that eosinophils as a blood marker of COPD remain controversial and more basic and systematic experiments are needed to clarify the pathogenesis of blood eosinophils in patients with COPD to better serve the clinic in the future.

The limitation of the study includes the study was unicentric and was conducted on a limited number of patients. Another limitation is that patients were not classified regarding their airflow limitation and were not followed throughout the exacerbation to trace the outcome.

Conclusion

Blood eosinophil count can be used as a severity marker of COPD exacerbations. The eosinophil levels, either in blood or sputum, were significantly correlated with the degree of exacerbation. Sputum eosinophilia can also predict the risk of hospitalization. In addition, blood eosinophil count can direct the use of oral corticosteroids in exacerbation.

Availability of data and materials

Tables are included.

Abbreviations

AECOPD:

Acute exacerbation of COPD

CBC:

Complete blood picture

COPD:

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

ICS:

Inhaled corticosteroids

mMRC:

Modified Medical Research Council

SGOT:

Serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase

SGPT:

Serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase

References

  1. Qureshi H, Sharafkhaneh A, Hanania NA (2014) Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations: latest evidence and clinical implications. Ther Adv Chronic Dis 5(5):212–227 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4131503/

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brusselle G, Pavord ID, Landis S, Pascoe S, Lettis S, Morjaria N, Barnes N, Hilton E (2018) Blood eosinophil levels as a biomarker in COPD. Respir Med 138:21–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tashkin DP, Wechsler ME (2018) Role of eosinophils in airway inflammation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 13:335

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bafadhel M, Pavord ID, Russell RE (2017) Eosinophils in COPD: just another biomarker? Lancet Respir Med 5(9):747–759

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bafadhel M, Greening NJ, Harvey-Dunstan TC, Williams JE, Morgan MD, Brightling CE, Hussain SF, Pavord ID, Singh SJ, Steiner MC (2016) Blood eosinophils and outcomes in severe hospitalized exacerbations of COPD. Chest. 150(2):320–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Landis SH, Pimenta JM, Yang S, Compton C, Barnes N, Brusselle G (2019) Association between blood eosinophils and acute exacerbation of COPD risk in patients with COPD in primary care. Respiratory Medicine: X 1:100011

    Google Scholar 

  7. Feng X, Qian Z, Zhang B, Guo E, Wang L, Liu P, Wen X, Xu W, Jiang C, Li Y, Wu Z (2018) Number of cigarettes smoked per day, smoking index, and intracranial aneurysm rupture: a case–control study. Front Neurol 9:380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Milačić N, Milačić B, Dunjić O, Milojković M (2015) Validity of CAT and mMRC-dyspnea score in evaluation of COPD severity. Acta medica Medianae 54(1):66–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hastie AT, Martinez FJ, Curtis JL, Doerschuk CM, Hansel NN, Christenson S, Putcha N, Ortega VE, Li X, Barr RG, Carretta EE (2017) Association of sputum and blood eosinophil concentrations with clinical measures of COPD severity: an analysis of the SPIROMICS cohort. Lancet Respir Med 5(12):956–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Singh D, Roche N, Halpin D, Agusti A, Wedzicha JA, Martinez FJ (2016) Current controversies in the pharmacological treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 194(5):541–549

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kolsum U, Donaldson GC, Singh R, Barker BL, Gupta V, George L, Webb AJ, Thurston S, Brookes AJ, McHugh TD, Wedzicha JA (2017) Blood and sputum eosinophils in COPD; relationship with bacterial load. Respir Res 18(1):88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brightling CE, McKenna S, Hargadon B, Birring S, Green R, Siva R, Berry M, Parker D, Monteiro W, Pavord ID, Bradding P (2005) Sputum eosinophilia and the short term response to inhaled mometasone in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax. 60(3):193–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bafadhel M, McKenna S, Terry S, Mistry V, Reid C, Haldar P, McCormick M, Haldar K, Kebadze T, Duvoix A, Lindblad K (2011) Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: identification of biologic clusters and their biomarkers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 184(6):662–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Singh D, Kolsum U, Brightling CE, Locantore N, Agusti A, Tal-Singer R (2014) Eosinophilic inflammation in COPD: prevalence and clinical characteristics. Eur Respir J 44(6):1697–1700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Couillard S, Larivée P, Courteau J, Vanasse A (2017) Eosinophils in COPD exacerbations are associated with increased readmissions. Chest. 151(2):366–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Oshagbemi OA, Franssen FM, Braeken DC, Henskens Y, Wouters EF, Maitland-van der Zee AH, Burden AM, de Vries F (2018) Blood eosinophilia, use of inhaled corticosteroids, and risk of COPD exacerbations and mortality. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 27(11):1191–1199

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yun JH, Lamb A, Chase R, Singh D, Parker MM, Saferali A, Vestbo J, Tal-Singer R, Castaldi PJ, Silverman EK, Hersh CP (2018) Blood eosinophil count thresholds and exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol 141(6):2037–2047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vedel-Krogh S, Nielsen SF, Lange P, Vestbo J, Nordestgaard BG (2016) Blood eosinophils and exacerbations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The Copenhagen General Population Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 193(9):965–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wedzicha JA (2016) Eosinophils as biomarkers of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation risk. Maybe just for some? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 193:937–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bafadhel M, Peterson S, De Blas MA, Calverley PM, Rennard SI, Richter K, Fagerås M (2018) Predictors of exacerbation risk and response to budesonide in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a post-hoc analysis of three randomized trials. Lancet Respir Med 6(2):117–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cai CS, Wang J (2019) Blood eosinophil level to predict chronic obstructive pulmonary disease clinical outcomes: not ready yet. Chin Med J (Engl) 132(19):2373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu HX, Zhuo KQ, Cheng DY (2019) Peripheral blood eosinophil as a biomarker in outcomes of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 14:3003

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was utilized in the present study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

    Laila Ashour Helala & Eman Badawy AbdelFattah

  2. Abbasyia Chest Hospital, Cairo, Egypt

    Hazem Mohamed Abd Elsalam

Authors
  1. Laila Ashour Helala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eman Badawy AbdelFattah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hazem Mohamed Abd Elsalam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

LAH Choosing the research subject, Revising the manuscript. EBA Choosing the research subject, Writing the manuscript, Follow up the patient data collection. HMA Follow up the patient data collection, Practical part of the research. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eman Badawy AbdelFattah.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was reviewed and accepted by the institution ethical committee of scientific research, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University ( FMASU MSO 01/2022). Data were collected anonymously from patients’ records.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Helala, L.A., AbdelFattah, E.B. & Elsalam, H.M.A. Blood and sputum eosinophilia in COPD exacerbation. Egypt J Bronchol 16, 49 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43168-022-00151-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43168-022-00151-9

Keywords